Morgan Dutemple
← All expertise areas

Expertise

Web Accessibility: designed in from the start

The majority of accessibility audits that arrive too late share the same original flaw: accessibility was treated as a list of corrections, never as a design constraint. I integrate accessibility analysis and compliance upstream of projects, not as a late fix.

Accessibility auditWCAG complianceAccessibility by design

My approach

  • Full accessibility audit: contrast, semantic structure, keyboard navigation, screen reader compatibility
  • Accessibility by design: integrated into the design system, not revised screen by screen
  • Prioritisation of corrections by real impact on users, not just legal compliance
  • Team awareness to prevent the same non-conformities from recurring
Legal compliance and real accessibility, not just cosmetic
Integrated upfront, never as a late correction

Frequently asked questions

Is WCAG compliance legally required?

In the EU, the European Accessibility Act requires digital products and services of private organisations to meet WCAG 2.1 AA by June 2025. In France, RGAA compliance is mandatory for public bodies and companies with turnover above 250 million euros. For others, it is a strong practice and is often required in public tenders.

What is the difference between WCAG and RGAA?

WCAG (Web Content Accessibility Guidelines) is the international standard produced by the W3C. RGAA is the French transposition, produced by DINUM, which adds specific tests and clarifies evaluation methods. In practice, RGAA compliance implies WCAG AA compliance.

How long does an accessibility audit take?

For a standard-sized site (5 to 10 distinct templates), allow 3 to 5 working days for a complete manual audit. The report includes the list of non-conformities by criterion, their severity level, and prioritised correction recommendations.